It must be that I’m talking to more brand consultants these days because I’m starting to hear the same gripe: that marketers are often clueless that branding needs to occur across all customer interactions.
It may sound like a really simple concept but one which apparently eludes most marketers, why? It might just be that ensuring consistent branding isn’t easy considering all the minute details you have to pay attention to, or just a perception that certain functions are only meant to achieve the ‘functionality’ objective. I was talking to a brand consultant earlier today and he mentioned in passing that it was odd how many companies fork out huge sums of money to release a polished and sleek commercial which makes them look really good to customers. But when customers call into the company’s call centre or dial in to complete a telephone banking transaction, their idea and expectation of the brand (no doubt brought on by that nice commercial), and the reality of what they discover on the other end of the line can provoke a huge disappointment. “And that’s where the disconnect happens,” says the brand consultant. “What’s the use of spending so much money on the TV commercial then?”
The brand consultant also said marketers need to be cognisant of the changing environment around them, and to change with it. A phone banking system that’s five-years-old isn’t going to cut it with customers anymore -- many marketers probably only have the time to make sure that they have a system, but then don’t do anything to it or forget about it after some time. Is that still the right way of interacting with customers, can you ‘update’ the voice on the other end, put in some new music perhaps? Simplify and make the technology easier? Maybe marketers need to get out of the thinking mode where they think a function, like the company delivery guys, merely serve as a functionality when in fact, they’re are at the ‘frontline’ of your brand and have a strong influence on the image projected to customers. It’s a difficult situation: marketers are sometimes placed in a situation where they just have to get in there and do it, while these branding improvements take time to carry out and more often than not, is a long term effort. When there is space and time to take care of these areas though, I’ll bet it’ll pay off putting in place training programs for staff and ensuring all other consumer interactions are consistent with the overall branding, because having a keen eye for detail in your branding can be the key to what makes you stand out from your next competitor.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Thanks for your comment MGL, I agree with you that it's easier for consultants to comment from afar when they're not in the thick of it, as marketers are.
However, and I'm just thinking out loud here, while the theories may be far-fetched, wouldn't marketers would be able to take a little something away from those theories? After all, they originated from the author's observations of a real-life organisation. Also, I do know of branding agencies who have been engaged by companies to implement brand consistency measures, so it is an achievable task, with a little help. But I'm no branding expert and these are just my thoughts on the matter.What are your/any other marketer's thoughts? What's the reality here, is it really a case of easier said than done, mainly because marketers have to deal with the nitty gritty of the job and have no time for the conceptual stuff? In which case it can be done, with some help?
I think brand consultants act as what they are supposed to do, as consultants to marketeers; as often marketeers being in the thick of the action may not see the whole picture. More often marketeers are product-driven, while branding consultants are consumer-driven. I think the two roles should co-exist.
Post a Comment